전체메뉴
Article Search

PNF Preventive Nutrition and Food Science

Open Access


ISSN 2287-8602
QR Code QR Code

Original

Article

Original

Prev Nutr Food Sci 2020; 25(3): 246-253

Published online September 30, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2020.25.3.246

Copyright © The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition.

Antigenotoxic and Antimutagenic Effects of Andrographis paniculata , a Traditional Medicinal Herb against Genotoxicity of Cyclophosphamide: An In Vitro Study on Human Peripheral Lymphocytes

Ayyakkannu Purushothaman1, Parveen Sufiya1, Packirisamy Meenatchi1, Ramalingam Sundaram1, and Nallappan Saravanan2

1Post-Graduate and Research Department of Biochemistry, Mohamed Sathak College of Arts and Science, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600119, India 2Department of Zoology, Government Arts College, Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nadu 636007, India

Received: May 19, 2020; Accepted: June 15, 2020

Abstract

Andrographis paniculata (family: Acanthaceae) is a medicinal herb-used in Indian system of medicine (Ayurveda, Siddha, and Unani), traditional and folk systems to treat various illnesses. This study examined the phytochemical constituents of ethanol extract from A. paniculata and its protective effect against genotoxicity caused by cyclophosphamide (CPA). Phytochemical screening and estimation of total phenolic content were analyzed using standard methods. The bioactive components from the ethanol extract of A. paniculata (EAP) were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. To investigate the protective effect of EAP against CPA-induced genotoxicity, human peripheral lymphocyte cultures were used. To test the antigenotoxic and antimutagenic effects of EAP, lymphocytes were treated with different concentrations of extract (50∼250 mg/mL) alone and co-treated along with CPA+EAP for 48 h. The cells were analyzed for structural chromosomal aberrations (CAs) and sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) in control, CPA treated, and CPA+ EAP co-treated lymphocytes. Results of the study revealed that the lymphocyte cultures which had 48 h continuous exposure to EAP (50∼250 mg/mL) did not show any significant changes in CAs and SCE frequencies. These results substantiate the antimutagenic nature of the extract. Furthermore, the lymphocytes co-treated with CPA along with extract showed a significant reduction in CAs (reduced from 26.50±2.50% to 11.00±1.00%) and SCEs (reduced from 9.92±0.63 per cell to 4.56±0.18 per cell). These results suggest that A. paniculata is protective against CPA induced genotoxicity and put forward its possible use as a supplement with chemotherapeutic drugs.

Keywords: Andrographis paniculata, chromosomal aberrations, cyclophosphamide, genotoxicity, sister chromatid exchange

Fig 1.

Figure 1.

Photographs showing Andrographis paniculata. (A) Whole plant, (B) shade dried leaves, (C) powdered sample, and (D) ethanol extract.

Preventive Nutrition and Food Science 2020; 25: 246-253https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2020.25.3.246

Fig 2.

Figure 2.

A representative gas chromatography-mass spectrometry chromatogram of ethanol extract from Andrographis paniculata.

Preventive Nutrition and Food Science 2020; 25: 246-253https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2020.25.3.246

Table 1 . The phytochemical components in ethanol extract of Andrographis paniculata based on preliminary phytochemical screening tests

No.Phytochemical constituentTestInference
1AlkaloidsWagner’s test++
Mayer’s test
2CarbohydratesMolisch’s test+
Fehling’s test
3FlavonoidsShinoda test++
4GlycosidesBorntrager’s test++
Legal’s test
Keller-Killiani test
5SaponinsFroth test+
6SteroidsSalkowski reaction+++
7Tannins and phenolic compoundsFerric chloride test++
Lead acetate test
Nitric acid test
8TerpenoidsLibermann-Burchard’s test+

+, mildly present; ++, highly present; +++, more highly present.


Table 2 . Extract yield and total phenolics content for Andrographis panicuata

SampleExtract yield (%)Total phenolics (mg GAE/g)
Extract of A. paniculata15.24±1.7635.66±3.42

Each value is expressed as mean±SD from minimum of three independent experiments.

GAE, gallic acid equivalent.


Table 3 . Major phytochemical components identified by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis from ethanol extract of Andrographis paniculata

Retention timePeak area (%)Name of the compoundLibrary ID
16.4483.89Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptanes 2,6,6-trimethyl-(1α,2β,5α)17013 00687613760
Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane, 2,6,6-trimethyl16968 00047355255
Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane, 2,6,6-trimethyl-, [1R-(1α,2β,5α)]17016 00479586250
17.3201.45Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester1194003998
Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester0001123998
Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester1194063997
000112
119408
000112
17.68319.79n-Hexadecanoic acid10754910399
n-Hexadecanoic acid00005710398
tert-Decanoic acid10754863893
000057
84453 000544
19.1357.45Phytol14139386799
Phytol00015086790
Phytol14139386774
000150
141395
000150
19.35315.06Oleic acid129338 00011280199
9-Octadecenoic acid (E)129353 00011279899
6-Octadecenoic acid12934066898
1000336
19.5564.04Octadecanoic acid131262 00005711498
Octadecanoic acid131261 00005711496
Octadecanoic acid131258 00005711496
23.20113.912-Amino-4-morpholino-6-phenylcarbamoyl-1,3,5-triazine144180 00753763553
Ethanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy phenyl)57688 00247838845
Ethanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy phenyl)57687 00247838843
24.0152.36Anthranilic acid, N-methyl-, butyl ester66844 01523634743
1,2-Benzisothiazol-3-amine tert-butyldimethylsilyl11369957238
Hexahydropyridine, 1-methyl-4-(4,5)100033247138
66899 094427
26.2084.731,2-Benzithiazol-3-amine tert-butyldimethylsilyl11369957250
2-(Acetoxymethyl)-3-(methoxycarbonyl) biphenylene100033270946
5-Methyl-2-phenylindolozine129190 09310399743
67006 036944
28.2128.18Stigmasterol216703 00008348756
tert-Butyl(5-isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy) dimethylsilane11412802338
Cyclohexane carboxamide, N-furfuryl100036732838
66823 006341
28.79328.61γ-Sitosterol217434 00008347690
β-Sitosterol217432 00008346556
Stigmast-7-en-3-ol, (3β,5α,24S)217448 01852535443

Table 4 . The structural chromosomal aberrations (CAs) and percentage of abnormal cells in human lymphocytes treated with cyclophosphamide (CPA) alone, Andrographis paniculata (EAP) alone and CPA+EAP after 48 h treatment

TreatmentCAStructural CA/cell% of abnormal cells

Chromatid breakageChromosome breakage
Normal control1130.076.50±0.50
CPA (100 μg/mL)38160.27**26.50±2.50**
EAP 50 mg/mL940.076.50±1.50
EAP 100 mg/mL1020.065.50±0.50
EAP 150 mg/mL1250.088.00±1.00
EAP 200 mg/mL1260.098.50±1.50
EAP 250 mg/mL1450.109.00±1.50
CPA+EAP 50 mg/mL33120.23*#21.50±1.00*#
CPA+EAP 100 mg/mL29120.21*#20.50±1.50*#
CPA+EAP 150 mg/mL2490.17**##15.50±1.50**##
CPA+EAP 200 mg/mL2090.15**##13.50±1.50**##
CPA+EAP 250 mg/mL1770.12**##11.00±1.00**##

Significantly different from normal control at *P<0.05 and **P<0.01, and positive control (CPA) at #P<0.05 and ##P<0.01.

CAs were evaluated in 200 well spread metaphases per concentration. A total 100 well spread metaphases per donor, no. of donors=2.


Table 5 . The SCEs per chromosome and sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) per cell in human lymphocytes treated with cyclophosphamide (CPA) alone, ethanol extract of Andrographis paniculata (EAP) alone and CPA+EAP after 48 h treatment

TreatmentNo. of metaphases scoredTotal no. of SCEs scoredMean SCEs / chromosomeSCEs/cell (mean±SE)
Normal control501270.05522.54±0.12
CPA (100 μg/mL)504960.2156**9.92±0.63**
EAP 50 mg/mL501200.05212.40±0.08
EAP 100 mg/mL501240.05392.48±0.06
EAP 150 mg/mL501190.05082.34±0.06
EAP 200 mg/mL501260.05472.52±0.11
EAP 250 mg/mL501310.05692.62±0.05
CPA+EAP 50 mg/mL504190.1821*#8.38±0.14*#
CPA+EAP 100 mg/mL503760.1634*##7.52±0.11*##
CPA+EAP 150 mg/mL503100.1347**##6.20±0.13**##
CPA+EAP 200 mg/mL502740.1191**##5.48±0.20**##
CPA+EAP 250 mg/mL502280.0991**##4.56±0.18**##

Significantly different from normal control at *P<0.05 and **P<0.01, and positive control (CPA) at #P<0.05 and ##P<0.01.

A total 50 well spread metaphases/cultures were scored for the occurrence of SCE, no. of donors=2.