Table. 9.

Table. 9. Table 9

Genus and species of probiotic supplementation in the included studies

Genus	Species	Studies wherein probiotic supplements were effective	Studies wherein probiotic supplements were ineffective
Lactobacillus	Lactobacillus gasseri	Cappello et al., 2013	Nobutani et al., 2017
	Lactobacillus acidophilus¹⁾	Cappello et al., 2013, Kommers et al., 2019, Cudmore et al., 2017, Ringel-Kulka et al., 2011, Radvar et al., 2020, Golkhalkhali et al., 2018, Lee et al., 2014, Ohigashi et al., 2011	Šmid et al., 2016
	Lactobacillus plantarum	Lorenzo-Zúñiga et al., 2014, Cappello et al., 2013, Drisko et al., 2006, Cudmore et al., 2017, Theodoropoulos et al., 2016	-
	Lactobacillus casei¹⁾	Cappello et al., 2013, Drisko et al., 2006, Kommers et al., 2019, Radvar et al., 2020, Golkhalkhali et al., 2018	Dapoigny et al., 2012, Macnaughtan et al., 2020
	Lactobacillus salivarius	Cappello et al., 2013	-
	Lactobacillus sporogenes	Cappello et al., 2013	-
	Lactobacillus brevis	Drisko et al., 2006	-
	Lactobacillus bulgaricus	Drisko et al., 2006, Cudmore et al., 2017, Radvar et al., 2020	-
	Lactobacillus salivarius	Drisko et al., 2006	-
	Lactobacillus rhamnosus	Drisko et al., 2006, Cudmore et al., 2017, Radvar et al., 2020, Lee et al., 2014	Ahmadipour et al., 2020
	Lactobacillus reuteri	Olgac et al., 2020	Riezzo et al., 2019, Ahmadipour et al., 2020
	Lactococcus lactis	Kommers et al., 2019, Golkhalkhali et al., 2018	-
	Lactobacillus paracasei	Theodoropoulos et al., 2016	-
	Leuconostoc mesenteroides	Theodoropoulos et al., 2016	-
Bifidobacterium	Bifidobacterium bifidum	Drisko et al., 2006, Kommers et al., 2019, Cudmore et al., 2017, Abbas et al., 2014	Gomi et al., 2018
	Bifidobacterium longum¹⁾	Cappello et al., 2013, Drisko et al., 2006, Radvar et al., 2020, Golkhalkhali et al., 2018, Di Pierro et al., 2020, Chen et al., 2016, Fujimori et al., 2009	Ahmadipour et al., 2020
	Bifidobacterium animalis	Cappello et al., 2013	Šmid et al., 2016, Ibarra et al., 2018
	Bifidobacterium lactis	Kommers et al., 2019, Xinias et al., 2018, Ringel-Kulka et al., 2011	Dimidi et al., 2019
	Bifidobacterium breve	Radvar et al., 2020	-
Streptococcus	Streptococcus thermophilus	Drisko et al., 2006, Radvar et al., 2020	Šmid et al., 2016, Gomi et al., 2018
Saccharomyces	Saccharomyces boulardii	Abbas et al., 2014, Choi et al., 2011	-
Bacillus	Bacillus subtilis	Choi et al., 2015	-
Bacillus	Bacillus natto	Ohigashi et al., 2011	-
Enterococcus	Enterococcus faecalis	Choi et al., 2015	-
Pediococcus	Pediococcus pentosaceus	Theodoropoulos et al., 2016	-
Pediococcus	Pediococcus acidilactici	Drisko et al., 2006	Ibarra et al., 2018
Clostridium	Clostridium butyricum	Chen et al., 2016	-

¹⁾Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium were the most common genera of probiotics that were used to study the effects of probiotic supplementation in clinical gastrointestinal investigations.

-, not available.

Prev Nutr Food Sci 2024;29:237~255 https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2024.29.3.237