Peer Review Policy
Peer review is used to help ensure the highest possible quality in published manuscripts. Scientists with expertise in the subject matter will evaluate the manuscript for validity of the experimental design and results, originality, significance, and appropriateness to the Journal. The Editors may exercise their prerogative to decline a manuscript without peer review if that paper is judged to be outside the scope of the Journal, poorly written or formatted, fragmentary and marginally incremental, or lacking in significance. All manuscripts submitted are reviewed and handled by the Editor-in-Chief or assigned to one of the Editors. The Editors are then responsible for the assigned manuscripts, including evaluating the content and format of the paper, selecting reviewers, monitoring the progress of the review process, evaluating the comments of reviewers and forwarding them to the authors for their response, communicating ultimate acceptance or rejection to the corresponding author, and carrying out a final check of accepted manuscripts for appropriate format and style.
Typically, two reviewers are selected per paper on the basis of the subject matter, available expertise, and the Editor's knowledge of the field. Reviewers are normally asked to provide their assessments within two weeks. Anonymous copies of the reviews and the Editor's decision regarding the acceptability of the manuscript are sent to the corresponding author. If the reviewers' evaluations of the manuscript disagree, or if reviewer's and Editor's comments are not satisfactorily addressed by the authors, the Editor may reject the manuscript or select additional reviewers. These additional reviews are used by the Editor to assist in reaching the final decision regarding disposition of the manuscript.
Journal Information
Editorial Office
Most Read / Downloaded
-
Hair Growth-Promoting Effects of Rosehip (Rosa canina L.) Seed Oil in C57BL/6 Mice
Van-Long TruongPrev Nutr Food Sci 2023; 28(4): 411-417 https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2023.28.4.411
, Woo-Sik Jeong Wheat and Wheat-Derived Beverages: A Comprehensive Review of Technology, Sensory, Biological Activity, and Sustainability
Thinzar Aung1Prev Nutr Food Sci 2023; 28(4): 401-410 https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2023.28.4.401, Mi Jeong Kim1,2 All Newest ArticlesInfluence of 8 Weeks of Tabata High-Intensity Interval Training and Nanocurcumin Supplementation on Inflammation and Cardiorespiratory Health among Overweight Elderly Women
Sepideh Noorbakhsh1Prev Nutr Food Sci 2023; 28(3): 224-234 https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2023.28.3.224, Valiollah Dabidi Roshan1,2 
-
Hair Growth-Promoting Effects of Rosehip (Rosa canina L.) Seed Oil in C57BL/6 Mice
Van-Long TruongPrev Nutr Food Sci 2023; 28(4): 411-417 https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2023.28.4.411, Woo-Sik Jeong Wheat and Wheat-Derived Beverages: A Comprehensive Review of Technology, Sensory, Biological Activity, and Sustainability
Thinzar Aung1Prev Nutr Food Sci 2023; 28(4): 401-410 https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2023.28.4.401, Mi Jeong Kim1,2 All Newest ArticlesEffect of Selenium Supplementation on Biochemical Markers of Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Systematic Review
Robab Kazempour1Prev Nutr Food Sci 2023; 28(2): 121-133 https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2023.28.2.121, Parvin Abedi2 , Shahla Faal Siahkal1 , Foruzan Sharifipour3 , Maryam Zahedian4
Flow chart of the literature search process.|@|~(^,^)~|@|Risk of bias graph.|@|~(^,^)~|@|Forest plot comparing the sex hormone-binding globulin level (nmol/L) between the selenium and placebo groups. SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardized mean difference; IV, interval variable; CI, confidence interval.|@|~(^,^)~|@|Forest plot comparing the testosterone level (ng/mL) between the selenium and placebo groups. SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardized mean difference; IV, interval variable; CI, confidence interval.|@|~(^,^)~|@|Forest plot of the sensitivity and subgroup analysis of the triglyceride level (mg/dL) between the selenium and placebo groups. SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardized mean difference; IV, interval variable; CI, confidence interval.|@|~(^,^)~|@|Forest plot comparing the cholesterol level (mg/dL) between the selenium and placebo groups. SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardized mean difference; IV, interval variable; CI, confidence interval.|@|~(^,^)~|@|Forest plot of the sensitivity analysis of the fasting plasma glucose level (mg/dL) between the selenium and placebo groups. SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardized mean difference; IV, interval variable; CI, confidence interval.|@|~(^,^)~|@|Forest plot comparing the insulin level (mIU/L) between the selenium and placebo groups. SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardized mean difference; IV, interval variable; CI, confidence interval.|@|~(^,^)~|@|Forest plot of the sensitivity analysis of the homeostasis model of assessment-insulin resistance level between the selenium and placebo groups. SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardized mean difference; IV, interval variable; CI, confidence interval.|@|~(^,^)~|@|Forest plot comparing body mass index between the selenium and placebo groups. SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardized mean difference; IV, interval variable; CI, confidence interval.Prev Nutr Food Sci 2023;28:121~133 https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2023.28.2.121© Prev. Nutr. Food Sci.
Full Text
PDF
PMC
Cite
Share
